United Conservatives of Virginia: Atlas Shrugs On Sarah Palin

United Conservatives of Virginia: Atlas Shrugs On Sarah Palin
Pam Geller nails it.

United Conservatives of Virginia: Battle for Oil Off Florida Caost

United Conservatives of Virginia: Battle for Oil Off Florida Coast

United Conservatives of Virginia: $4.00 a Gallon Who's To Blame?

United Conservatives of Virginia: $4.00 a Gallon Who's To Blame?

Remember this time last year? The only thing that has changed is the price of gasoline and the dhimmis are in charge with a documented socialist engineering agenda. We still have the same anti-American economic and national security policies when it comes to oil and gas exploration and putting American companies first.
The dhimmis are still working against this country's best interests.

From September 26 2008

Friday, September 26, 2008

Now We Know Whose Side They Are On
No Oil for Blood
Thanks to three American senators, China will be pumping Iraqi oil.
by Frederick W. Kagan
09/16/2008
3:15:00 PM http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/574iglgp.asp

Why, after all the assistance we've given to Iraq over the past five years, was the first major Iraqi oil deal signed with China and not with an American or even a western company? The answer is, in part, because three Democratic senators intervened in Iraqi domestic politics earlier in [2008] to prevent Iraq from signing short-term agreements with Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total, Chevron, and BP.

Will We Make It To 234?

Without the resolve of the soul of its people, July 4th, 2009 could be the last meaningful Independence Day for Americans.

There can no longer be any doubt that the malcontent who sits in the Oval Office has malevolence at heart for all things America.

President Barack Hussein Obama is, in essence singing from the same choir-book as Hugo Chavez, the Castro brothers, and even the evil and corrupt Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In fact, it is Obama’s voice that can be heard singing the Swan Song of America the loudest.

Today as main-street Americans muster the kind of spirit needed to celebrate July 4th, their country teeters on an engineered economic collapse. As they prepare for America’s Big Day, indignities are hurled at them, not just from a vociferous enemy across the world, but from an anti-American White House.

Even as Americans worry about losing their homes and jobs, information overload has become the bewildering status quo. The increasing asked, “What can we do?” is never answered.
Put in the vernacular of the lay person, everyone’s “talking at Americans”. Talking heads are talking at Americans from 24-hour television networks. Radio talk show hosts are talking at Americans. Internet writers are talking at Americans. Incoming emails have never been so brisk.

As everyone “talks at” Americans, their president is acting out.

Almost every day since November 4, 2008 Americans have heard about yet another Obama atrocity, each one bolder and more shameful than the one before.

Obama, or whomever this braggadocio Agent of Change really is, seems in a hurry to present a battered, and humiliated America back to the faceless masters he serves.

Opinion is coming at John Q. Public from every direction. They are as plentiful as the grains of sand in the Arabian Desert, some qualified, some sincere and heartfelt, some not, many confusing.

Let this July 4th be the time to tune out on the broken record of Obama. Replace all the talk of Obama with the resolve to bring American back from the brink, a time to replace talk with action.

Unless Obama brings to a halt his rampage over America, it is time for Americans to find the way out of the dark; time to take their country back, and time to stop being the tax base of Congress megalomaniacs.

Americans shouldn’t worry about inflated popularity polls. They shouldn’t worry about the Obamabot zombies who march as a mindless cult. Real life zombies are not frightening, for they lack passion and energy, and only follow along, lemming like, on the path of least resistance. At the end of the day, they are people made from plastic, film stars, hiding from their latest strand of gray hair, covering up skin without a tan and applying Botox to their wrinkles. The plastic people are shored up by people whose frail grip on reality is only held together by the bubblegum of a strong sense of entitlement, awaiting ships that never come in.

Americans shouldn’t worry about, but only tune out on a treasonous media. They worship at the altar of a hero whose feet are clearly clay. Media types are even more afraid than the people of of ending up on the wrong government list. They cower in offices hoping their fawning will keep them safe from harm.

Americans shouldn’t worry overly much about big talking Obama. The only place where he’s an airtight legend is in a mind plagued by delusions of grandeur. The kind of grandeur where he thinks he’s King of the World, the Michael Jackson of Politics, The Messiah. At the end of the day, Obama is only a desperado despot, and only a crass politician who made it to the top by virtue of wiping out his past.

As Americans celebrate this Independence Day, they know they are not the only people whose country is under threat, not the only people whose fight for survival is being carried out in real time.

In Iran, the fight for democracy continues, in spite of the torn and bloodied bodies that break the human heart, but not the human spirit. This is a fight for democracy that continues even where the Islamic Regime forces its way into hospital to arrest the wounded.

Americans can take heart from the people of Honduras who caught up with a president who tore up their Constitution. They gave him the bum’s rush, loaded him onto a plane in the borrowed clothes of another and sent him into exile.

Whenever there is darkness in the world, there is daylight somewhere else.

America will find the way out of the dark and into the light of a new day. And when the way out is found, it won’t come from the media, or any of the talking heads. It will come from the indomitable spirit carried for centuries in the hearts of true patriots.

The answer for the cunning but empty rhetoric of Obama is the same one used down through the ages by little people the world over. You don’t need a TelePrompTer to say it. All together now: “Throw the bum out!”

Judi McLeod Most recent columns
Copyright © Canada Free Press

We're Not Letting Up On This

More questions, and this time some good questions.

What passport did The Chosen One (may peace be upon him) use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?

How did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?

Once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration?

The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.

Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
A : Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?
A: There are only three possibilities.
1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
2) He traveled with a British passport, or
3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?
A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in 1981.

Conclusion:
When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with a British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were traveling with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims.

If he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967.

Whatever the truth of the matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he has presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.

If you don't care that your President is not a natural born Citizen and in violation of the Constitution, thats your problem and you are free to leave the country or start your own blog
and post your opinions.

Boehner's Brigade

HAPPY BIRTHDAY AMERICA

I HOPE WE MAKE #235

Everyone, here are media clips on Boehner’s web video thus far. All of the following clips either embed the video or link to it. YouTube also put it in the “spotlight videos” section of their News and Politics videos: http://www.youtube.com/news?s=rf.


Washington Post: Sharp Words from Republicans as Unemployment Edges Up
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/07/02/sharp_words_from_republicans_a.html?wprss=44

CNN: GOP Says Even Bloodhounds Can’t Find Stimulus Jobs
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/07/02/gop-says-even-bloodhounds-cant-find-stimulus-jobs/

Huffington Post: Boehner Video Stars “Job-Sniffing Bloodhound” To Whack Obama


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/02/boehner-video-stars-job-s_n_224701.html

WSJ: Republicans Blame Obama Policies for Job Losses
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/07/02/republicans-blame-obama-policies-for-job-losses/

Fox Nation: Would We Have Better Job #’s if Stimulus $ Had Gone to Small Biz?
http://www.thefoxnation.com/business/2009/07/02/would-we-have-better-job-s-if-stimulus-had-gone-small-biz

U.S. News & World Report: Boehner, Republicans Sick the Dogs on the Obama Stimulus Package
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/peter-roff/2009/07/02/boehner-republicans-sick-the-dogs-on-the-obama-stimulus-package.html

Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Lynn Westmoreland’s next career: Voiceover artist
http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/07/02/lynn-westmorelands-next-career-voiceover-artist/

First Read – GOP Hammers Obama on Job Losses
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/07/02/1985093.aspx

CQ: Bad Job Numbers? Blame Bush One More Time http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/balance_of_power/2009/07/bad-job-numbers-blame-bush-one.html

Real Clear Politics -- GOP: Where are the jobs?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2009/07/gop_where_are_the_jobs.html

New "Bloodhounds" Web Video Asks: Where Are the Jobs?
http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnBoehner/2009/07/02/new_bloodhounds_web_video_asks_where_are_the_jobs

Human Events: Boehner's Bloodhounds: ‘The Stimulus Isn't Working’ (Video)
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=32554

The Hill: Boehner ‘Releases the Hounds’ on the Stimulus
http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/02/boehner-releases-the-hounds-on-the-stimulus/

ABC’s The Note: http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/07/the-note-job-one-pressure-on-obama-to-show-stimulus-results.html

Frank Strategies Blog: Video: Boehner Releases the Hound on YouTube
http://frankstrategiesblog.com/2009/07/02/video-boehner-releases-the-hound-on-youtube/

We STILL Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident

Mark Alexander
Patriot Post

On July 4th of 1776, our Founders, assembled as representatives to the Second Continental Congress, issued a declaration stating most notably: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. ... That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..."

In other words, our Founders affirmed that our rights, which are inherent by Natural Law as provided by our Creator, can't be arbitrarily alienated by men like England's King George III, who believed that the rights of men are the gifts of government.

Our Founders publicly declared their intentions to defend these rights by attaching their signatures between July 4th and August 2nd of 1776 to the Declaration. They and their fellow Patriots pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor as they set about to defend the Natural Rights of man.

At the conclusion of the American War for Independence in 1783, our Founders determined the new nation needed a more suitable alliance among the states than the Articles of Confederation. After much deliberation, they proposed the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1787, ratified in 1788 and implemented in 1789 as subordinate guidance to our Declaration of Independence.

Since that time, generations of American Patriots have laid down their lives "to support and defend" our Constitution -- and I would note here that their sacred oath says nothing about a so-called "Living Constitution" as advocated by the political left.

Given that bit of history as a backdrop, consider the lexicography of our current political ideology.

On the dark side of the spectrum would be Leftists, liberals and tyrants.

(Sidebar: One should not confuse "classical liberalism" with "contemporary liberalism." The former refers to those, like Thomas Jefferson, who advocated individual liberty, while the latter refers to those, like Barack Hussein Obama, who advocate statism, which is the antithesis of liberty.)

Statism, as promoted by contemporary American liberals, has as its objective the establishment of a central government authorized as the arbiter of all that is "good" for "the people" -- and conferring upon the State ultimate control over the most significant social manifestation of individual rights, economic enterprise.

On the left, all associations between individuals ultimately augment the power and control of the State. The final expression and inevitable terminus of such power and control, if allowed to progress unabated, is tyranny.

The word "tyranny" is derived from the Latin "tyrannus," which translates to "illegitimate ruler."

Liberals, then, endeavor to undermine our nation's founding principles in order to achieve their statist objectives. However, politicians who have taken an oath to "support and defend" our Constitution, but then govern in clear defiance of that oath, are nothing more than illegitimate rulers, tyrants.

(Sidebar: Some Leftists contend that Communism and Fascism are at opposite ends of the political spectrum. Properly understood, however, both of these forms of government are on the left, because both have as a common end the establishment of an omnipotent state led by a dictator.)

Over on the "right wing" of the political spectrum, where the light of truth shines, would be "conservatives," from the Latin verb "conservare," meaning to preserve, protect and defend -- in this case, our Constitution.

American conservatives are those who seek to conserve our nation's First Principles, those who advocate for individual liberty, constitutional limits on government and the judiciary, and the promotion of free enterprise, strong national defense and traditional American values.

Contemporary political ideology is thus defined by tyrannus and conservare occupying the Left and Right ends of the American political spectrum, defining the difference between liberals and conservatives.

Though there are many devoted protagonists at both ends of this scale, the space in between is littered with those who, though they identify with one side or the other, are not able to articulate the foundation of that identity. That is to say, they are not rooted in liberal or conservative doctrine, but motivated by contemporaneous political causes associated with the Left or Right.

These individuals do not describe themselves as "liberal" or "conservative" but as Democrat or Republican. Further, they tend to elect ideologically ambivalent politicians who are most adept at cultivating special interest constituencies.

That having been said, however, there is a major difference between those on the Left and the Right, as demonstrated by our most recent national elections. Those on the Left tend to form a more unified front for the purpose of electability; they tend to embrace a "win at all costs" philosophy, while those on the right tend to spend valuable political capital drawing distinctions between and among themselves.

I would suggest that this disparity is the result of the contest between human nature and Natural Law.

The Left appeals to the most fundamental human instincts to procure comfort, sustenance and shelter, and to obtain those basic needs by the most expedient means possible. The Left promises that the State will attain those needs equally, creating a path of least resistance for that fulfillment.

On the other end of the spectrum, the Right promotes the tenets of Natural Law -- individual liberty and its attendant requirements of personal responsibility and self-reliance.
Clearly, one of these approaches is far easier to sell to those who have been systematically dumbed down by government educational institutions and stripped of their individual dignity by the plethora of government welfare programs.

That easy sell notwithstanding, the threat of tyranny can eventually produce an awakening among the people and a reversal of trends toward statism. But this reversal depends on the emergence of a charismatic, moral leader who can effectively advocate for liberty. (Ronald Wilson Reagan comes to mind.)

For some nations, this awakening has come too late. The most notable examples in the last century are Russia, Germany, Italy and China, whose peoples suffered greatly under the statist tyrannies they came to embrace. In Germany and Italy, the state collapsed after its expansionist designs were forcibly contained. In Russia, the state collapsed under the weight of 70 years of economic centralization and ideological expansionism.

The Red Chinese regime, having witnessed the collapse of the USSR, has so far avoided its own demise by combining an autocratic government with components of a free enterprise economic system. (My contacts in China, including that nation's largest real estate developers and investment fund managers, believe the Red regime will be gone within five years.)
Of course, there exists an American option for the rejection of tyranny: Revolution. And it is an essential option, because the Natural Rights of man are always at risk of contravention by tyrants. At no time in the last century has our Republic faced a greater threat from "enemies, domestic" than right now.

"Our individual salvation," insists Barack Obama, "depends on collective salvation." In other words, BHO's tyranny, et al, must transcend Constitutional authority. And in accordance with his despotic ideals, Obama is now implementing "the fundamental transformation of the United States of America" that he promised his cadre of liberal voters.

It is yet to be seen whether the current trend toward statism will be reversed by the emergence of a great conservative leader, or by revolution, but if you're betting on another Ronald Reagan, I suggest you hedge your bet.

Our Declaration's author, Thomas Jefferson, understood the odds. He wrote, "The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground," and he concluded, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
Accordingly, George Washington advised, "We should never despair, our Situation before has been unpromising and has changed for the better, so I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new Exertions and proportion our Efforts to the exigency of the times."

Indeed we must.

Semper Vigilo
SemperFortis
Semper Paratus
et
Semper Fidelis!

Mark AlexanderPublisher,
PatriotPost.US

What If There Were No Premiums To Tax

I don't know if anyone at the zoo has really thought this healthcare thing through to its logical outcome assuming they go through with a tax on the value of the employer provided part of your health insurance premiums.

I predict a massive cancellation of insurance coverage by individuals who won't stand still for another tax increase. If you don't purchase the insurance through your employer, you can't be taxed.

I see citizens banding together to purchase health insurance off the books with after tax dollars, resulting in a decrease of the tax revenue these Marxists are counting on to pay for the government healthcare.

If you're like me, you pay for your part of healthcare coverage with after tax income. (I hate those FlexPay plans...) It's expensive, or can be, depending on your provider. Assuming our portion is 25% of the total premium, we could be taxed at an earned income rate on approximately $600 to $1,000 a month in income we never recieve. I have never paid enough in healthcare premiums to qualify for a deduction on the Schedule A form, so the money I spend on insurance and medical costs is mine.

We have the right to do whatever is legal to avoid paying taxes. I'm not going to pay any more in taxes than I have to and I sure as hell ain't gonna pay taxes on non-cash, unearned income. I'll cancel my coverage and stick that money somewhere useful.

I will go looking elsewhere.

I see healthcare co-ops in our future. Groups of like-minded individuals banding together, forming some sort of 501(c) corporation and issuing RFP's (Requests for Proposal) to healthcare providers. We let them compete for our business, the way the system was intended and keep government out of it, the way the system was intended.

More :Little Known Facts About SEIU

Glenn is preparing to put the Service Employees International Union in the spotlight. Its about damn time somebody informed America about this pernicious bunch of leftist vermin.

Let me tell you what else SEIU does...

In March of 2005 Code Pink set up their death vigil at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, in Washington DC, under the guise of "concern for the wounded". Their justification was the Bush administration was "sneaking" wounded soldiers from the Iraq theater into Walter Reed under the cover of darkness so "Amrica wouldn't find out how many soldiers were actually being wounded."

They lined the sidewalk along Georgia Ave at the Main Gate in front of the hospital on Friday nights with flag-draped coffins and held signs which proclaimed "Your Son Was Maimed for a Lie"; "Sign Up Here To Die For Halliburton".

I have a ton of stories from wounded soldiers and their families who told me in no uncertain terms that they hated these people and wanted them gone. Imagine going to visit your loved one in an Army hospital on Friday night and having to endure a bunch of anti-war, anti-military protesters. A few Blue Star Moms almost went to jail over this.

SEIU provided "boots on the ground" for the marxist hags from code pink because no one really wanted to set up a war protest in front of an Army hospital filled with soldiers hurt in that war.
They also recruited homeless people and what I can only describe as "thugs" to intimidate the growing counter-protest organized by the DC Chapter of Free Republic.

(The story begins here) This link will take you to a post from March 29, 2005 on freerepublic.

(The story continues here) this is from March 30, 2005

This link is the one that made history. January 21, 2006

and if you scroll down this page, on the right side there are links with the tag "Shameless Self Promotion". Just saying. (Hint: Michelle Malkin) Andi's doesn't work anymore.

According to some of the "participants" we have managed to speak with, SEIU requires it's members to take part in this demonstration. They are still there, in significantly reduced numbers, half a block down from the Main Gate. They still think their presence is good for the morale of the wounded.

They are idiots and Marxists and loathe our military and have no regard for Duty, Honor, or Country.