21 December 2012

BLACKFIVE: The Burden of the Sheepdog...

BLACKFIVE: The Burden of the Sheepdog...

--There are sheep and there are wolves. Thats why we need sheepdogs.

16 December 2012

The Anarchist Soccer Mom: Thinking the Unthinkable

The Anarchist Soccer Mom: Thinking the Unthinkable

Get through this one without using a tissue and you're not human or you have no soul.

15 December 2012

Allergic to Bull: A Few Thoughts About the Crime in Connecticut And Gun Control

Allergic to Bull: A Few Thoughts About the Crime in Connecticut And Gun Control

Leaked WBC Personal Contact Information

Leaked WBC Personal Contact Information---

OK these Anonymous guys are starting to impress me. Ya gotta love this.
Oh and the westboro ba'athists are going to "celebrate God's judgement" by showing up in Newtown Connecticut for the funerals. Isn't that special? Too bad we can't get some folks up there to make them feel that special welcome we reserve for asshats and idiots with no class and no morals.

02 December 2012

Celebrity Victims Make L.A. Times Get Serious on Swatting

Celebrity Victims Make L.A. Times Get Serious on Swatting

Someone is going to get seriously hurt and Brett Kimberlin will be the cause. Kimberlin is a convicted felon and accused murderer, responsible for what has been termed "The Speedway Bombings".

This is one sick son of a bitch that needs to be put down.

28 November 2012

You're Either On the Bus, or Under the Bus


Tossing Susan Rice Under the Bus 

by Paul R. Hollrah

Trying to make some sense of the Susan Rice fiasco is like trying to make some sense of how the most incompetent and the most corrupt presidential candidate in American history managed to get himself reelected.  It probably can’t be done.  But, just for the sake of argument, it might be interesting to engage in a bit of conjecture about how Susan Rice got picked to go under the bus.   

First some background.  On Sunday morning, September 16, five days after an Islamic terrorist group, Ansar al Sharia, attacked the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, killing U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, Barack Obama sent U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to appear on all five Sunday morning network talk shows.  Rushing from one broadcast studio to the next, Rice appeared on ABC’s This Week, CBS’s Face the Nation, CNN’s State of the Union, Fox’s Fox News Sunday, and NBC’s Meet the Press… and all within a time span of just two hours.  

The tale that Rice told at each stop was typical of what she stated on ABC’s This Week, where she said, “Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous – not a premeditated – response to what had transpired in Cairo… In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated.  We believe that folks in Benghazi, a small number of people came to the embassy to – or to the consulate, rather – to replicate the sort of challenge that was posed in Cairo.  And then as that unfolded, it seems to have been hijacked, let us say, by some individual clusters of extremists who came with heavier weapons… And it then evolved from there.”

So the question arises… and persists… why was the U.N. Ambassador chosen to deliver such a whopper to the American people when, in fact, she had no connection to and no responsibility for the consulate in Benghazi? 

The most logical pecking order of people who should have been called upon to answer for what happened at Benghazi is, in order: Barack Obama, President and Commander in Chief; Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State; Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense; General James Clapper, Director of National Intelligence; Michael Morrell, Acting Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Tom Donilon, National Security Advisor; and General David Petraeus, former Director of Central Intelligence.

As the principal architect and political beneficiary of the Benghazi fable, Barack Obama was not about to go on record as the bearer of what everyone would soon know was a false narrative.  But because he had hopes of explaining away the Benghazi terror attack in a way that would not damage his “al-Qaeda-is-on-its-heels” narrative two months before the November election, he had to have a patsy to carry his tale to the American people who was not only credible, but also expendable.  The one person who fit that description was U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice.  And who is the only person who could make that decision, and who is the only person who could tell her exactly what to do and what to say?  Ambassador Rice is not in Hillary Clinton’s chain of command, so the order could have come from only one person: that would be Barack Obama.

He couldn’t expect Hillary to play that role.  As soon as the Benghazi story made the headlines, Hillary packed her polyester suits, grabbed her attaché case and her “body woman,” and got the hell out of town.  In a brief statement issued from Lima, Peru on Monday, October 15, where she was presumably conducting nuclear disarmament talks with the Peruvians, Clinton said, “I take responsibility.  I want to avoid some kind of political gotcha.”

Then, after stopping off in Washington just long enough to pick up a few changes of “undies,” she was off again on an extended tour of Hawaii, Vietnam, China, Cambodia, Malaysia, New Guinea, New Zealand, and Australia, returning on November 8, two days after the November election, when her testimony could not damage Obama’s reelection chances.

Compelling diplomatic business?  No.  Compelling political business?  Yes.  If Hillary had been in Washington and available to the Congress, she would have had some very difficult questions put to her.  And since it was Bill Clinton who was most responsible for exciting the Democratic base and getting Obama reelected, the last thing Obama wanted was to see Hillary sitting before a congressional committee.  The only thing to do was to get her out of town.

But what of Leon Panetta, the Secretary of Defense?  In terms of an attack on a U.S. embassy or consulate abroad, Panetta’s only connection would have been in relation to a military rescue operation or a military response to al-Qaeda.  But since it appeared as if he had disobeyed Obama’s order to “secure our people” in Benghazi, Panetta was keeping a decidedly low profile.  Obama didn’t want Panetta having to answer questions about why he and Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dempsey had disobeyed his order.  Or, worse yet, having Panetta reveal that Obama had not given such an order… Obama’s public pronouncements to the contrary. 

General James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI)?  In his previous incarnation he served as Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI), an oxymoron if ever there was one.  Clapper's role in the Benghazi scandal shouldn't surprise anyone.  It certainly didn't surprise author Bob McCarty, who’s upcoming book, The Clapper Memo, will expose some of the DNI’s earlier exploits as USDI which are now “coming home to roost” in the form of so-called “Green-on-Blue” attacks in Afghanistan.

If there is a chief suspect in the effort to find who it was that rewrote the CIA talking points of September 12, which identified Ansar al Sharia as the al-Qaeda subsidiary responsible for the Benghazi attack, the finger would most logically point to General Clapper.  And since Obama must have known that his Director of National Intelligence was not a man to be trusted with the responsibility for carrying out an assignment of such strategic political importance… and get it right five times within two hours… he knew that General Clapper was not his man. 

Michael Morrell, the Acting Director of Central Intelligence?  This is the same Michael Morrell who in testimony before a congressional committee on Thursday, November 15, attempted to shield Susan Rice from criticism.  He told the committee that Rice had been provided with an unclassified version of the deadly attack in Benghazi that was incorrect. 

He failed to explain to the committee how or why, if the CIA knew on September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, that the attack was carried out by an Islamic terrorist group, they allowed the U.N. Ambassador to appear on five Sunday morning TV interviews four days later, carrying a totally false narrative.

National Security Advisor Tom Donilon?  When the White House leaked classified information detailing the Navy SEAL methodology that brought Osama bin Laden to justice in Abbottabad; identifying the Pakistani doctor who assisted U.S. intelligence personnel in locating bin Laden; and providing details of the US-Israeli cyber attack on the Iranian nuclear program, it didn’t take then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates long to figure out who was responsible for the leaks.

As Jake Tapper of ABC News has reported, “… Gates went to see Donilon, offering up a barbed assessment of how the White House had handled the aftermath of the (bin Laden) raid.

“ ‘I have a new strategic communications approach to recommend...’

“ ‘What was that?’ Donilon asked.

“ ‘Shut the f_ _ k up,’ the defense secretary said.”

Donilon’s credibility was so damaged by that episode that Obama didn’t dare send him before the five Sunday morning talk shows carrying a false version of the Benghazi attack.

And finally, General David Petraeus.  In the days following the Benghazi attack, Obama knew two very important things about his Director of Central Intelligence.  First, in spite of numerous denials to the contrary, Obama had to have known that Petraeus was under investigation by the FBI in connection with the Paula Broadwell affair.  In other words, he knew that his Director of Central Intelligence was in a potentially compromising position.  And finally, he knew that he could count on a man of Petraeus’s caliber to go only so far in parroting a false narrative in which politics trumped all other considerations.

Obama’s only choice was U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, another incompetent hanger-on who had ambitions to succeed Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.  Her ambition would dictate that she do what she was told without asking too many questions.  And with an ethically neutral mainstream media as watchdogs, there was a very good chance that they could pull it off.

Sorry, Obama.  Your luck just ran out.  There’s room for only so many “expendables” under that bus of yours and now you’ll have to pay the price.  Most importantly, if we’re lucky, and if we can find just a few members of Congress with the backbone to do what’s right, it appears all but certain that we’ll find an impeachable offense or two in all of this... just something to make your second inauguration a most memorable one.

Was Benghazi A False Flag Op Meant To Insure Re-Election?

and make the Muslim Brotherhood the heros in a rescue action? It would explain why the SEALs were told to stand down. It would not explain why Dear Leader was absent for 7 hours.
Where was he? Why are there no pictures from the Situation Room like there were when SEAL Team 6 took out Bin Laden? Dear Leader was ready to take all the credit for that operation. He wasn't shy about releasing a lot of intel regarding the Bin Laden take down. Why is he hiding from this one?

Why Petreaus was sacrificed:
This thing is playing out like a well written mystery novel. Is the worst still yet to come?

I received this message yesterday. If this proves to be true, it is impeachable grounds. It also may help explain why Petreaus was forced out a few days before the Benghazi hearings. It explains a lot of the behavior by Obama and his administration - the pulled security, the "stand down" orders, and blaming everything on that stupid video. The fireworks may be coming.
And it could be the first of many disasters ahead.

According to sources in the State Department and the CIA, and intercepted communications from the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama "staged" the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental "October Surprise" that would guarantee him re-election.

Yes, you read that right, and no, I'm not making this up. Obama, we now know is and has been working with the Muslim Brotherhood secretly to engineer the release of the "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel Rahman, the mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center attack.

In Obama's October Surprise, he intentionally set up the consulate to have no security so that Chris Stevens could be kidnapped and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda (and the Muslim Brotherhood). Then, several days before the election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making himself look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing re-election.

This was one of the top reasons why Obama was so insistent on the Muslim Brotherhood getting $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to have a primary role in getting Obama re-elected. That is why, even though they knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were intended to quietly slip into the compound when the attack began. And they did, just as planned. That is why, even though 2 C-130U gunships, which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there
, and were a mere 45 minutes away, were never scrambled at any time during the attack.

There was to be no resistance whatsoever. That is why there were not one, but TWO armed drones flying over the consulate during the conflagration... Our CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available. That is why, even though requesting support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but were intentionally
and specifically DENIED three times, and they were told to "stand down," which basically means to "surrender." That was part of Obama's plan.

They were not to fight back. That would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary "complications." That is why, even though the CIA operatives and ex-Navy Seals were on the ground, providing real-time reports, and even though they were "lighting up" the source of the mortars attacking the compound with lasers, no gunships or support ever came. They weren't supposed to resist. That wasn't "part of the plan." It also wasn't part of the plan for one of the CIA operatives to intentionally defy Obama's orders, and who rescued the body of Sean Smith and then stood up against orders and engaged the enemy who was attacking American soil. It was supposed to be "clean, quick and efficient”.

Kidnap the Ambassador and get out.

They didn't factor in a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives... American Patriots and heroes. Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, they managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out over 80 attackers in the process, which enraged the attackers who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance.

THAT is why Ambassador Stevens was murdered and dragged through the streets. In their warped minds, they believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S.
yet again. They believed that Obama was their friend. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, there were 80 of their own dead by American hands.

Obama was asked directly in an interview if he denied their request for assistance
.  He refused to answer, and instead droned on with a canned response promising to "bring those responsible to justice."  Former CIA and State Department personnel are coming out now with damning evidence that indicts President Obama and reveals the truth about what is going on.  Stay tuned.

FBI May Impound ‘Pro-Obama’ Voting Machines

and that, my friends, will be that. We will hear no more of this nonsense. Now go back to your homes and pretend you still live in a free society that values honesty and integrity.

FBI May Impound ‘Pro-Obama’ Voting Machines
Despite there being evidence of massive voter fraud in the presidential election; despite the Obama Administration suppressing the traditionally conservative military vote by “losing” absentee ballots and simply mailing them out too late to make a difference, election officials have, as expected, ignored the mounting calls to investigate whether Obama actually won the election.

Now a movement is afoot to impound the thousands of voting machines that “malfunctioned”, switching a Romney vote to one for Obama. Some local officials have put the suspected voting machines in “quarantine” before they can be erased of information to determine if, in fact, the Obama campaign hacked into the machines.

Many local officials are calling on the FBI to do a forensic analysis of the voting machines—which are really computers—to determine if they have, in fact, been “hacked.”

22 November 2012

THE BIG LIST of vote fraud reports

THE BIG LIST of vote fraud reports

They stole it folks. We are now offically a third world country with a tincup dictator and sycophants in charge of everything. Thanks morons. Enjoy your "utopia".

For Fourth Straight Year, Obama's Thanksgiving Message Doesn't Thank God

For Fourth Straight Year, Obama's Thanksgiving Message Doesn't Thank God
No one cares as long Dear Leader keeps handing out the free stuff and giving the unions a reach around.

No mention of thanking God. None.

But, of course, we’re used to this. In 2011, there was no mention of God at all. In 2010, Obama was closer, but still missed the mark (“we’ll spend some time taking stock of what we’re thankful for: the God-given bounty of America, and the blessings of one another”). In 2009, Obama didn’t thank God, either.

Compare that to Obama’s Thanksgiving Day proclamations, which he does not read or speak. Those are filled with God – at least for the last three years. In his first year, filled with the vim and vigor of his original election, Obama preferred to eschew any direct thanking of God even in his proclamation.

2012: “On Thanksgiving Day, individuals from all walks of life come together to celebrate this most American tradition, grateful for the blessings of family, community, and country. Let us spend this day by lifting up those we love, mindful of the grace bestowed upon us by God and by all who have made our lives richer with their presence.”

2011: “As we gather in our communities and in our homes, around the table or near the hearth, we give thanks to each other and to God for the many kindnesses and comforts that grace our lives. Let us pause to recount the simple gifts that sustain us, and resolve to pay them forward in the year to come.”

2010: “As Americans gather for the time-honored Thanksgiving Day meal, let us rejoice in the abundance that graces our tables, in the simple gifts that mark our days, in the loved ones who enrich our lives, and in the gifts of a gracious God.”

Of course, nobody sees these proclamations, so Obama doesn’t have to be embarrassed about them.

It’s no wonder that this President’s Democratic National Committee platform tried to remove God. He’s not a big fan of the Big Guy. Even on Thanksgiving. After all, what need do you have for God when you’ve got the state?

Fail: Lone Union Worker Walks Out of Walmart

Fail: Lone Union Worker Walks Out of Walmart

BAAAAWAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Poor baby. She cant live on 12 bucks an hour then bitches about the taxpayers supporting her food stamp habit.

And Honey, YOU pay Medicare taxes.

“They pay low wages, then the taxpayers pick up the tab for food stamps and Medicaid,” said Ferreira. “They need to take care of their people. They need to be responsible to their workers.”

Huffington Post tried to champion Ferreira as a brave soul:

Whatever strikes hit Walmart stores this Friday, it's likely only a small, perhaps miniscule fraction of the retailer's 1.4-million member U.S. workforce will take part. And though news footage may show boisterous gatherings by activists outside stores, the more daring acts of protest will have been undertaken by individual workers like Ferreira who walk out when there are no TV cameras around. In recent days, it became clear that if she went on strike she would probably do so alone.

But even Ferreira acknowledges that the other Walmart employees say she doesn’t speak for them, and are annoyed by her theatrics.

Unions Set To Strike Against Boeing

Unions Set To Strike Against Boeing

Shut down LAX in the midle of the Thanksgiving Holiday.
Tell me again why these dhimmis are good for America?

SEIU Leader Incites Riot After Cory Booker Makes Controversial Vote

SEIU Leader Incites Riot After Cory Booker Makes Controversial Vote

And so it begins. They are turning on their own. Hopefully, this will help to thin the herd and reduce the number of opposition forces.

19 November 2012

A Message To WalMart Workers Preparing To Protest Increase In Healthcare Premiumns

I heard ya'll are going to picket/protest/march/gather/assemble/act stupid in front of your employers' stores on Black Friday to protest/whine/bitch about/blame corporate greed for the increase in ya'lls healthcare premiums.

Aint America a great place? You are actually free, by virtue of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, to perform the aforementioned actions without fear of being arrested/detained/renditioned/shot or otherwise deprived of your liberty/freedom/livelihood.

Now I have a piece of advice for all of you who will be performing the aforementiond actions and  I truly have your best interests in mind and this is for the sake of your own health and safety:

DO NOT BLOCK THE WALMART SHOPPERS!!!
THEY WILL RUN YOUR ASS DOWN and never miss a beat.

Now I have an observation regarding the increase in the cost of your healthcare premiums:
IT REALLY SUCKS TO BE YOU!!!!

Here's why:
90% of you whining, bitchy little girls voted to keep the poser in office who is responsible for the increase.
90% of you also voted for the low-life scum sucking dhimmicrat politicians who voted to force the healthcare legislation on the rest of us. The rest of you didn't vote. Neither group has the right to bitch about the increase.

YOU VOTED TO RAISE THE COST OF YOUR OWN PREMIUMS!!!

Did you get that? Its YOUR fault. You did it to yourself. You also did it to the remainder of the Americans who have employer-furnished healthcare. I know this because my premiums have been going up about 20% every year since this montrosity was shoved down our throats.

I have one more piece of advice for you idiots, morons, and whing bitchy little girls:
SUCK IT UP!!!!

Go to work and help your employer turn a profit. You might be surprised at the outcome.

An Explanation of Islam and Why It Cannot Work In America

H/T to a Brother Marine for the heads-up

There are those who say that Islam is a “religion of peace.”  Of those, some are liars and the rest are delusional.  Islam is what it is, but the one thing it can never be is a respected participant in any civilized society.  Events of early September in which radical Islamists either attacked or laid siege to U.S. embassies across the Muslim world, should be proof enough of the violent nature of Islamists.  In Benghazi, Libya, the U.S. Ambassador and three others were brutally murdered in an al-Qaeda attack.  It is reported that Ambassador Stevens was brutally sodomized before he was murdered and his body put on display in the streets of Benghazi. 

The nature of Islam is such that, in the absence of a complete and total renunciation of the Quran and Sharia Law, it is impossible for any Muslim believer to participate in western society.  Under the Islamic concept called Taqiyya, a Muslim is permitted to deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts, so long as that dishonesty inures to the benefit of Islam. 

It is what allows devout Muslims to take the naturalization oath that all new U.S. citizens must take.  They swear as follows:  "I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the armed forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

 When devout Muslims take that oath are they being sincere?  No, they are willfully lying.  It is the concept of Taqiyya… the right to lie… that Muslim’s rely on when they take the oath to become citizens of the United States.

 In the mistaken belief that their 7th century culture is superior in every way to western cultures of the 21st century, Islam has not attempted to hide or sugar-coat their ultimate goal, which is to replace civil society in every western nation with an Islamic society based on Sharia Law and the Quran.  Accordingly, Islam offers those of us in western cultures a rather simple choice: either convert to Islam or die. 

 But what if we in the Christian world refuse to convert, and what if we prefer to live rather than die?  What is our alternative?  Given the choice between converting to Islam or going to our final reward, our only reasonable alternative is to begin now to quarantine Muslims to those regions  of the world where they can share their misery with none but other Muslims.  If co-existence between Islam and the other major religions is not an option, then Islam must yield.  Islam must go the way of communism and fascism, and that must be done in a timely manner before they are allowed to achieve majority status in any Western nation.  Time is short. 

The 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”  Conversely, the Quran teaches that Islam is the only true religion and that all other religions and all the peoples of the world must yield to it and submit to it.  To suggest that those of the Christian or Jewish faith can somehow reach an accommodation or a compromise with Islam, or to co-exist peaceably with it, is to state an absurdity.

The Declaration of Independence, perhaps the most beautiful collection of words ever penned by the hand of man, proclaims that, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Muslims may interpret those words to mean that all men are created equal, but we Americans interpret them differently.  We understand those words of equality to include all human beings, regardless of gender.  In the Muslim world, the Quran teaches the inferiority of women and specifically approves and recommends the practice of wife-beating.  Girls and women are treated no better than farm animals and in some cases, when the male members of a family feel as if the family honor has been damaged by a female family member… even in cases where she may have been forcibly raped… that woman may be put to death in what Muslims call an “honor killing.”         

Islam is so repulsive to civilized societies and such a great danger to the lives and property of all non-Muslims, that an organization called Stop the Islamization of Nations (SION) has begun the process of developing a detailed plan to bring a halt to the Islamization of the Christian world. 

But who would know Islam better than those who’ve had the courage to leave the faith?  An organization called FaithFreedom.org is, in their own words, “a grassroots movement of ex-Muslims” whose goal it is to tell the truth about Islam and to promote the adoption of a   constitutional amendment outlawing Islam in the United States. 

The organization’s website states that, “Muhammad’s merry band of disciples raided villages, looted and raped the women, and enslaved all who were not killed outright… No other cause is responsible for more deaths than Islam… Islam can’t be reformed, but it can be eradicated.  It can’t be molded, but it can be smashed… ” 

 In a November 24, 2010 article published by FaithFreedom.org, Dr. Jai Maharaj outlines the scope of a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  As justification for the constitutional amendment, he writes:

“Islam is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution.  It is necessary to outlaw the practice of Islam in the United States of America because the teachings of this religion are antithetical to many vital provisions of the U.S. Constitution and represent an existential threat to the security of American citizens.  Furthermore, Shariah law, which is intrinsic to all orthodox forms of Islam, which is based directly on the Qur'an, seeks, as a stated goal of the religion, to replace civil law with a system based on inhumane values on the presumption that these values are superior to anything in the Constitution or in the religions of the world, including the religious faiths of the vast majority of Americans.” 

Dr. Maharaj reminds us that “The United States was founded on ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one's religion of choice, or no religion, and that compulsion to practice any religion is not tolerable… Islam, in contrast, rejects each of these principles and is therefore incompatible, on a fundamental level, with American citizenship.”

He writes, “Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and impose its will on all other religions and upon democratic institutions.  This view is completely unacceptable to Americans and is anti-Constitutional.” 

He reminds us that “Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Islam, does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil, and this being the case, it would be unjustifiable to regard Islam as in any way compatible with the many religions which exist in the United States.  To suppose that the character of Islam is such that it can peacefully co-exist with followers of other faiths is, to be candid, an absurd proposition. 

“Islam includes as its basic tenet the spread of its faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions, none of which is remotely compatible with the (United States) Constitution.  Additionally, representatives of Islam around the world… have declared jihad on America and regularly declare that America should cease to exist, and this being the case, any other course than outlawing Islam within the (United States) would be folly.”

In making the case that 1st Amendment protections of the U.S. Constitution would in no way be incompatible with an anti-Islam amendment, Dr. Maharaj argues that Islam is a sworn enemy to everything that America stands for.  He writes, “Because Islam is subversive by its very nature, and antagonistic to followers of all other religions, actively seeking to harm people of other faiths, and actively seeking to replace the U.S. Constitution with an alien legal system that is abhorrent to Americans, Muslims have no claim to First Amendment freedoms or protections.”

So how do we respond to those on the political left who are certain to wave the Constitution under our noses, defending the right of radical Islamists to subjugate all non-Muslims, including the people of the United States?

The 1st Amendment contains no language prohibiting the people of the United States from taking whatever steps are necessary to defend themselves from invasion and subjugation by purveyors of an alien political, economic, and religious culture.  Nowhere does it compel the American people to drink the poison-laced Islamic Kool-Ade, and nothing in the Constitution compels us to commit national suicide.  It’s us or them.  Either Islam must be tamed or it must be outlawed, just as communism was in times past.  

11 November 2012

Not That It Matters Now, BUT...

These four questions are very interesting and thought provoking. Please check them out and if you find that the information is important, pass it along.
1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is "African-American" when the term wasn't even used at that time ?
2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth
as August 4, 1961 & Lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right ? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in " Kenya , East Africa ". This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet
exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British East Africa Protectorate".
3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed place
of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological
Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.

How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978 ?


http://
http://http/www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
(
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx)

Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media ?

4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama’s book on his father. He states how proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I’m not a math genius, so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama’s “birth certificate” says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when he was born. That should have put his father’s date of birth approximately 1936—if my math holds (Honest! I did that without a calculator!!!) Now we need a non-revised history book—one that hasn’t been altered to satisfy the author’s goals—to verify that WW II was basically between 1939 and 1945. Just how many 3 year olds fight in wars? Even in the latest stages of WW II his father wouldn’t have been more than 9. Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes (still qualifies as a “liar”) ?

29 September 2012

I Guess the VLWM Was At Lunch

Federal Government Was Culprit in Housing and Economic Crisis, Says Congressional Report

Washington (CNSNews.com) –

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were the chief culprits in the housing crisis because they encouraged people who could not afford payments to borrow money, according to a congressional report released Tuesday. The claims in the report have long been advanced by conservatives, who argue that the Community Reinvestment Act and other federal programs fed the housing bubble that burst in 2007 and led to the economic downfall in 2008. But the report explains in detail how Fannie and Freddie - government sponsored enterprises (GSE) that were not subject to the same oversight as other publicly traded firms -- “privatized their profits but socialized their risks.”

17 September 2012

PJ Lifestyle » When Is a Religion not a Religion?

When it requires/mandates the subjugation of humans based on gender or belief.
When it requires/mandates the murder of innocents and non-believers in order for believers to achieve their "final reward".

In short: Islam is not a religion, it is a murderous, twisted cult of evil spawned by lucifer to recruit ignorant savages.

PJ Lifestyle » When Is a Religion not a Religion?

With the exception of Kirsten Powers, I cannot think of one media liberal who does not see how utterly delusional the administration’s response to these riots has been. This may be going out on a limb, but my guess is this had been in the planning for a long time. I wonder what other Muslim deaths movie man was responsible for in the last week? How about the 92 people killed in 13 separate bombings in Iraq on the conviction in absentia of former VP Tarique Hashemi; or the 12 people killed in a car bombing in a public market in Pakistan near the Afghan border; or the assassination attempt on 9/11 of the Yemeni foreign minister which killed about 12; or, on his second day in office, the suicide bombers’ killing of 12 while failing to assassinate Somalia’s new president; or perhaps the suicide bombers’ attempt to blow up a police station in Istanbul?

14 September 2012

ISLAMIC ISSUES 12-135: America Was Warned-Marines Were Not

ISLAMIC ISSUES 12-135: 

........America was warned of the clear and present and growing potential for assault on our compounds. The excuse of the YouTube video mocking Mohammed was a deliberate antecedent act staged to give “legitimacy” to these well thought out attacks. In truth these attacks (possibly like the YouTube video) was planned and staged by al-Qaeda. In-point-of-fact the Libyan Islamic Security Group (LISG) was a lead group in the attack carried out on our Libyan consulate, and they were augmented by a radical Islamic group named Ansar al-Sharia. Make no mistake this long awaited wave of violence has been well orchestrated and methodically carried out given the fact that our embassies in Morocco, Tunisia, Yemen, Oman, Egypt, and even Israel have come under attack, too. Intelligence sources who have kindly assisted me over the past couple of years also informed me that there is solid evidence that:
                                                                   
1). The U.S. State Department was aware of a planned major demonstration by the terrorist group Jamaa Islamyia outside the Cairo Embassy for August 30th, but just prior to initiation, it was called off. Equally, the State Department was fully aware of the rocket attack on the British Ambassador in June while traveling through the streets of Libya.
                                                                  
2). Security at ALL American compounds was not reinforced or even placed on a heightened level of alert given Intel suggesting the annual 9/11-Remembrance could be a significant day and/or “Flash Point”. And by now, we all know of the egregious and inexcusable order given that U.S. Marines should not be armed. Initial reports also show a “slow response time” of Egyptian Security Forces when the American Embassy came under attack. Even today with two U.S. Navy destroyers standing off-shore of Libya, there are NO ORDERS, NO DIRECT MISSION.
                                                                 
3). The attack in Benghazi shows evidence of a well-coordinated military attack, as I referenced above. There is now evidence showing the consulate had been under surveillance, the attack came in organized waves, the attackers were very well armed with heavy assault weapons, including RPGs. The physical lay-out of the consulate, including “safe house” was known to the attackers.

4). Tomorrow, Friday, may prove to be an even more insidious day since the Muslim Brotherhood has called for demonstrations even during the Muslim Sabbath. This is not unusual since all rules are situational in Radical Islam. During the Arab Spring, Friday prayers were used to promote major demonstrations since a ready supply of folks were already congregated in one place. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood has called for a “Million Man March.”

I believe you reap what you sew, and we are beginning to sew not-so-good stuff. The United States, these past few years, has been slowly decimated in major categories – especially financially and militarily. We are not able to maintain the level of strength we have all become accustomed to, and the world (at least those countries that depend on us for security and world stability) has become accustomed. A very strong argument can be made that America is in rapid decline. You factor in political people at all levels of our government who believe in appeasement, and who see the world through glasses, the likes many of us have no idea from which they purchased them, and we have events like the past 48-hours, with more to come. United States intelligence and political leaders have greatly underestimated what is taking place in the Middle East, and there is an actual belief system rampant in Washington, D.C. that the Arab Spring (backed by Obama/Clinton/Panetta) was a good thing, a well-deserved event, and the countries that participated are functioning countries with developing democracies! This is a crock!

The failure of U.S. intelligence and political leaders to recognize (believe) you cannot respond to the war waged by radical Islamist terrorist groups by simply throwing more money at them, caving at their demands, fearing their threats, appeasing their ideology and trying to make friends has led to this serious probing of our sovereignty and resolve to protect our interests. Going around pounding on your chest with glee claiming the “Witch is Dead, the wicked witch”…oops, “Osama bin Laden is dead,” and believing all is right with the world is naïve, sophomoric, and makes me wonder who really is minding the store and keeping watch over us? America’s so-called leaders have grossly failed to grasp the significance of what is taking place in the quickly changing political climate in the post-Arab Spring States, and the Middle East in general.

24 August 2012

Lawyer of recently released ex-marine speaks to Glenn about violation of civil rights – Glenn Beck

Lawyer of recently released ex-marine speaks to Glenn about violation of civil rights – Glenn Beck

On GBTV Thursday night, Glenn interviewed John Whitehead, lawyer for Brandon Raub, the ex-marine who was taken into custody after he posted some controversial remarks on Facebook.

Earlier in the show, Glenn had criticized the authorities for taking Raub into custody without any warrant or pressing any charges. He pointed out that it was straight out of the 1963 Communist playbook to use the psychiatric profession as a means of coercion against those who disagreed with their philosophy. Furthermore, he argued that it was the equivalent of a “shark bump”, a minor attack to see how people would react. If they ignored this event, it could to lead to further civil rights violations down the road. (Emphasis mine)
I said the same thing two days ago. There will be more. Each time it happens, the weight of the free people must fall on the heads of the perpetrators. They must know we will not stand for these tactics being used against any free American and most assuredly we will not allow our veterans to be treated as criminals. Defend everyone's right to be free and speak openly whether you like what they say or not. However, calls for violence must be answered with the proper tools. If a group or representative of a group calls for the murder or bombing of another group, that person should be investigated. Prior acts must be weighed. The propensity for violence based on empirical data must be evaluated. You cannot call for the murder of American citizens and be given a pass. That is not a 1st Amendment right.

Defend the rights of others to speak that which upsets you the most. Only then can you truly call yourself an American.

communist tactics, suppression, Waco, religious persecution, Marine, Raub, Rutherford Institute, glennbeck, gbtv

22 August 2012

Political Abuse of Psychiatry—An Historical Overview

You should know this. This is serious.

Political Abuse of Psychiatry—An Historical Overview

The use of psychiatry for political purposes has been a major subject of debate within the world psychiatric community during the second half of the 20th century. The issue became prominent in the 1970s and 1980s due to the systematic political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union, where approximately one-third of the political prisoners were locked up in psychiatric hospitals. The issue caused a major rift within the World Psychiatric Association, from which the Soviets were forced to withdraw in 1983. They returned conditionally in 1989. Political abuse of psychiatry took also place in other socialist countries and on a systematic scale in Romania, and during the first decade of the 21st century, it became clear that systematic political abuse of psychiatry is also happening in the People's Republic of China. The article discusses the historical background to these abuses and concludes that the issue had a major impact on the development of concepts regarding medical ethics and the professional responsibility of physicians.

US Adopts Nazi Policy Of Indefinite Psychiatric Detention For Political Views

US Adopts Nazi Policy Of Indefinite Psychiatric Detention For Political Views

Yes friends and neighbors, you read that right. Remember Waco and the 183 people who burned? The government did that to see how far the citizenry as whole could be pushed when religious freedom was at stake. No one seemed to care that we had military units deployed to a county in Texas where a group of citizens were living peacefully and enjoying God's graces. They died and the government was at fault and the citizenry bought the lie. They were wierd; they were an offshoot cult of a cult religion is the lie the government encouraged the citizens to believe.

Now we have a young Marine combat veteran who by all accounts never made a single threat or called for the murder of Americans or the destruction of property detained for a psych eval based on some words on a Facebook page. What did he say that was so terrifying?

He believes the path this country is currently on is one that will lead to the enslavement of the entire population.

Guess what?

SO.DO.I

25 July 2012

Idaho Businessman Faces Two Federal Audits for Backing Romney

Idaho Businessman Faces Two Federal Audits for Backing Romney

Things are getting out of hand. This needs to stop right now. This is Stalin's USSR.
What the hell is going on in America?

If you ever needed a reason to vote to remove the current occupier of the White House, then I respectfully submit the above story.

If you can't see the danger to America when this is allowed to happen, there is no hope for you.

TAGS:intimidation, IRS, audit, brownshirts, jackboots, USSR, Stalin, Russia,

22 July 2012

Finally! Veil lifted on Muslim rape epidemic

Finally! Veil lifted on Muslim rape epidemic

This is freedom of religion? They're afraid of being labeled "anti-mooooslim"?
The poor dears are scared they'll be called racist?
Fine. Go home, lock your doors, cover your eyes and wait for the "all-clear" signal.
I'm sure you'll hear it anytime now.

Meanwhile, there will be a few who aren't afraid to call these monsters what they are: PEDOPHILES & CHILD RAPISTS just like the pedophile child rapist they claim is their leader.
This is what happens when you put women in the same class as animals.
Islam-Religion of Peace my ass.
or is that the Religion of a Piece of Ass from a 13 year-old girl?

For years there have been reports on blogs, personal testimonials and the like, about what looked like a literal epidemic of rape by Muslim men of both women and children, especially in northern European nations where the Muslim immigrant population is high.

But the disturbing reports rarely rose to the level that would make the general population aware of the dangers that were becoming evident. After all, such a report would be blasted for attacking Islam and discriminating against Muslims.
Until now, when a case from the United Kingdom has proven so egregious it could not be ignored.

The BBC reported that nine men were convicted of child sexual exploitation in Greater Manchester, after they had “groomed” girls as young as 13. But even there, the report identified the convicts only as “Asian” while revealing their victims were white.

The Guardian took one more step and labeled them as “Pakistani,” but it took a lesser-known online news site, The Salfordian, to identify the suspects as “Muslim men” who “plied girls as young as 13 with drink and drugs so they could use them for sex ‘several times a day.’”

Now, the subject that long has been ignored or suppressed finally may be getting the attention a major crime wave would deserve, regardless of the political correctness of the facts.

Officials at The Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank dedicated to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report, have spoken up.

In a commentary just days ago, the organization noted that the three-month trial where the “nine Muslim men were found guilty of raping dozens of British children” revealed that “police and social workers in northern England repeatedly refuse to investigate Muslim pedophile gangs: they said they are afraid of being called racist.”

“The disturbing details that emerged during the trial have opened yet another chapter in a long-running debate about multiculturalism in Britain, where many say that political correctness has gone too far,” the foundation said. “Less than a month after the trial in Liverpool ended … it emerged that social workers in the city of Rotherham, also in northern England, had known for six years that a teenage mother (identified as Child S) who was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani men who had used her for sex, was at clear risk from predatory Muslim gangs.”

Dana Milbank Hurls McCarthyism to Shield Obama from Criticism

Dana Milbank Hurls McCarthyism to Shield Obama from Criticism
You are a racist, bigoted, knuckle-dragging neanderthal if you say/think Dear Leader is doing a lousy job of running the country.

We saw this in 2008, when the desperate and desperately corrupt media attempted to silence legitimate criticism of Obama by equating and tying that criticism to racism, crazies, and extremists. And what this is is nothing more than a form of New McCarthyism, by means of which you smear, terrorize, and marginalize those you disagree with by drawing a very long and dark line from what they've said or what they believe in to portray them as scary, freaky, wacko lunatics who might be dangerous.

20 July 2012

MILLER: Obama’s jam-packed schedule - Washington Times

MILLER: Obama’s jam-packed schedule - Washington Times

President Obama gave up his day job working for the American people so he could have more time to campaign for himself. To fit in all the fundraisers and stump speeches, he’s set aside things like meeting with his jobs council and working with Congress. His priorities say a lot about his character.

In a campaign speech to supporters in Jacksonville, Fla., on Thursday, Mr. Obama promised he would “wake up every single day and spend every waking hour thinking about you, fighting as hard as I knew how for you because I see myself in you.” Mr. Obama said with their support, “We will win Florida and we will win this election. We’ll finish what we started in 2008.”

Mitt Romney’s campaign seized on the statement. “President Obama claims he spends ‘every waking hour’ trying to fix the economy — but that must be news to his own jobs council that he hasn’t had time for in six months,” said Ryan Williams, the Republican candidate’s spokesman. “Americans deserve better, and deserve a president who will put middle-class workers ahead of his own re-election.”

BLACKFIVE: The Elephant in the Room- I wanna be Rich

BLACKFIVE: The Elephant in the Room- I wanna be Rich

This is classic Uncle J.

17 July 2012

Schumer: Hey, you don’t really need all those free speech rights do you? » The Right Scoop -

All you have to remember about Chucky Boy is this: When he was first elected to Congress, his first piece of legislation was a bill to repeal the 2nd Amendment. He submitted that legislation every year he was in the House. Once you know that fact, you know everything you need to know about Chucky Boy. Charles "Chucky Boy" Schumer is an anti-Bill of Rights leftist tool and an assclown of the First Order.

Schumer: Hey, you don’t really need all those free speech rights do you? » The Right Scoop -



H/T Right Scoop

14 July 2012

Lying By Omission – The Latest Obama Campaign Tool

Lying By Omission – The Latest Obama Campaign Tool

There are many kinds of lies- barefaced, minimization, white lies, contextual lies, and economy with the truth lies. Lying by omission is only one of over twenty-five kinds of lies; yet it ranks among the most deadly and nefarious of them all.

It is a matter of emphasis that far exceeds the “glass is half-full” analogy but is more like sleight of hand, magic, or prestidigitation. It is a call to look at what I am holding in this hand so you won’t see what I am doing with the other. When utilized in political campaigning, it is always a desperate attempt to divert attention away from a dismal record or performance.

Lies of omission are particularly offensive because they rely on the assumed ignorance of those who hear them. They are an insult to the intelligence and intuitiveness of most people because they depend on the hearer’s ignorance or distraction to have any effect at all. Telling lies of omission requires a great sense of timing as well. Politicians use the last days of a campaign to blast the lies across the campaign trail and hope that there is not enough time for the sycophants to research or uncover what Paul Harvey used to call ‘the rest of the story.’

Is She Or Isn’t She? | Power Line

Is She Or Isn’t She? | Power Line

Where do I enlist?

10 July 2012

Brad Pitt’s Brother Speaks Out On Mom’s Death Threats « Pat Dollard

Brad Pitt’s Brother Speaks Out On Mom’s Death Threats « Pat Dollard

In case you missed it: Brangelina's mom (Brad Pitt for those of you without TV or Internet) wrote a letter to the editor of her St Joseph's MO newspaper, in response to another writer who wrote supporting Bambi. Mrs Pitt essentially said the writer was a dufus, and Bambi is a socialist and a liar bent on destroying America.

Well, the ever tolerant and peaceful left lashed out with some of the most vile, despicable attacks on Mrs Pitt that I've seen in, well, days. IOW, the left did what they always do, and do best, when they are confronted with ideas and beliefs for which they have no response: they attack the messenger and call for immediate execution or worse.

Brad Pitt supports Bambi because Brad Pitt is a dumbass leftist stool-tool. His mother supports Romney because she has the sense God gave her, the benefit of having lived in America for the last 60 years, and isn't afraid to speak out.

That has changed. The left has silenced her through intimidation. That is the only weapon the left has in the war of ideas. They cannot defend the marxist socialist ideology without sounding like idiots, so they resort to sounding like thugs and savages. Its all they know.

Barack Hussien Obama is a G_d damn Marxist. He is a serial liar. David Axelrod is a G_d damn Marxist. He is also a serial liar. Joe Biden is a stupid oaf, a serial liar and the dumbest Vice President since Ford and Mondale.

God please do not let anyone hurt the President and get him out of harms way as soon as possible. Novemeber 6, 2012 is the date I recommend.

VP Is A Serial Liar & A POS Scumbag

Biden: 'Republicans Have Changed the Law So You Get Arrested If You Do Vote'

Biden, one of the dumbest vice-presidents since Gerald Ford, is also a lying POS and a scumbag American.


Douche of the Week/Month/Year?

Douche of the Week/Month/Year?

Mr Twisted has some valid points. I know I could use some extra ammo, a few more high-powered handheld pointing devices. Check it out. Be forewarned, Mr Twisted isn't shy about expressing his opinions.

09 July 2012

Video: Taliban shoot woman 9 times in public execution as men cheer - CNN.com

Video: Taliban shoot woman 9 times in public execution as men cheer - CNN.com

NOW had this to say about the brutal treatment of women by moooslim extremists:
~~~~~~~~
The ACLU also had a comment about religious freedom:
~~~~~~~~~
Yeah, I hear crickets.

07 July 2012

Obama: Confused About the Declaration

Obama: Confused About the Declaration

Not just confused, historically challenged on a major scale.

Given recent comments he made from the White House, Obama's not much of a student of History, or human rights, either. '"In his remarks, Obama suggested that the Declaration (of Independence) was the first time the God-given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness had been "put to paper."'
So I guess the Magna Carta was just a whim?

Obama’s Social Security Number Seriously Challenged « Pat Dollard

Obama’s Social Security Number Seriously Challenged « Pat Dollard

A must read. This is serious. Not only is it serious, this Lady will need protection if it goes much further.

British Muslims Targeting Underage White Girls, Gang Raping Them By The Hundreds « Pat Dollard

British Muslims Targeting Underage White Girls, Gang Raping Them By The Hundreds « Pat Dollard

The men of our societies are failing their fundamental duty to protect their women from such animals by letting them into our societies in the first place. We know how Islam feels about women, and about women who are not Muslims, and we know that the rape of both is culturally sanctioned. The men of Western societies have neutered themselves and lost the rights to their own women by abdicating their responsibility to protect them, with the knife of political correctness. By bowing to PC in almost every form, men are no longer protecting their women and children, period.
When it comes to the surface here, what will our government do?
The thugs and savages that practise the twisted cult that is islam will claim religious persecution and our government will pack it's balls in a box and whimper. The ACLU will step up and offer free legal defense.

05 July 2012

Lawyers Have Already Drafted 13,000 Pages of Regulations for New ObamaTax Law | The Gateway Pundit

Lawyers Have Already Drafted 13,000 Pages of Regulations for New ObamaTax Law | The Gateway Pundit
"Let me tell you how it will be,
There's one for you, nineteen for me
I'm the Taxman"

Rules Committee to Hold 'Emergency' Meeting Monday on Health Care Repeal

July 5, 2012 | 7:45 p.m.|
The House Rules Committee will convene in an expedited meeting on Monday to consider a measure to repeal President Obama's signature health care reform law, according to a statement from the panel's spokesman.

Under committee rules, Monday's business is considered an "emergency" meeting because a hard copy of the measure must be available to members of the panel at least 24 hours before a meeting. While the text is available online now, the bill is not expected to be introduced until Monday, said committee spokesman Doug Andres.

Last week, Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's office said the vote to repeal the health care law would be set for July 11.

Blogger Aaron Walker Wins First Amendment Victory over Brett Kimberlin

Blogger Aaron Walker Wins First Amendment Victory over Brett Kimberlin

In a victory for the First Amendment and citizen journalism, blogger Aaron Walker won a decisive victory over convicted felon and left-wing activist Brett Kimberlin in a Maryland courtroom today. Judge Nelson Rupp ruled that Walker blogging about his belief that Kimberlin framed him for a crime was not harassment, overturning an earlier ruling that stated that Walker, who writes at Allergic To Bull, was not allowed to blog about Brett Kimberlin ‘in any way’.

In the first hearing, on May 30th, Judge Cornelius Vaughey ruled that blogging about Kimberlin qualified as ‘contact’ with him, and proceeded to order Walker not to write about Kimberlin in any way--including, he added, blogging, tweeting, sending smoke signals, using radar, sonar or laser.

03 July 2012

Rep. West: Let’s Force Everyone to Buy a Glock 9mm | Video | TheBlaze.com

Rep. West: Let’s Force Everyone to Buy a Glock 9mm | Video | TheBlaze.com

If we can work out a compromise, I'd prefer a .40 or an M1911.

Homeland Security Funded Study Lists People Reverent of Individual Liberty as Extreme Right-Wing Terrorists | TheBlaze.com

Homeland Security Funded Study Lists People Reverent of Individual Liberty as Extreme Right-Wing Terrorists | TheBlaze.com

Interestingly, in an oversight that is not explained, the report barely mentions radical Islam. Instead the study lumps religious terrorist groups into one category and describes them as “groups that seen to smite the purported enemies of God and other evildoers, impose strict religious tenants or laws on society (fundamentalists), forcibly insert religion into the political sphere.”
Well of course they're not going to single out radical islamist extremists, because jihad is a legitimate religious tenent and it's religious freedom when they murder innocents in the name of a pedophile.

The Elephant In the Port-a-Potty

02 July 2012

Obama Backs Israel-Bashing at the UN

Obama Backs Israel-Bashing at the UN

Don't trust this man to do the right thing when Israel is on the line. He will betray the Jews just as surely as Judas.

Where ever we stand we stand with Israel

Bill Whittle gives a pep talk to conservatives after Obamacare ruling » The Right Scoop -

Bill Whittle gives a pep talk to conservatives after Obamacare ruling » The Right Scoop -

This is a great pep talk by Bill Whittle, who seeks to encourage us not to lose heart after the Obamacare ruling by the Supreme Court. It’s short, sweet, and effective:

30 June 2012

Border Patrol agents told ‘run away,’ ‘hide’ from gunmen

Border Patrol agents told ‘run away,’ ‘hide’ from gunmen

Well they may as well. If they shoot someone in the performance of their duties, the Border Agents will be the ones on trial. The shooter will be given amnesty, a new ID, citizenship, 40 acres, a mule and for all I know, his choice of girlfriends form the Caracas Catalogue.

I wouldn't blame them one bit if they thought twice about taking out a bad guy. Remember Campean and Ramos? Why put yourself in that position?

“We are now taught in an ‘Active Shooter’ course that if we encounter a shooter in a public place we are to ‘run away’ and ‘hide’” union leader Brandon Judd wrote on the website of 3,300-member union local.  
“If we are cornered by such a shooter we are to (only as a last resort) become ‘aggressive’ and ‘throw things’ at him or her. We are then advised to ‘call law enforcement’ and wait for their arrival (presumably, while more innocent victims are slaughtered).”

27 June 2012

Allergic to Bull: What Happened Tonight

Allergic to Bull: What Happened Tonight

Aaron Walker recounts his SWATing experience from this past Monday night 25 June.

Let me say upfront that what is going on in this country borders on the insane. Leftwing kooks like Kmberlin get their panties in a twist because a conservative blogger tells the truth, then Kimberlin's little groupies step up and act on his behalf, calling in false police reports. Not just false reports, false reports involving gunfire and murdered wives which makes the police a little nervous and apprehensive when they answer the call.

If this doesn't stop, an innocent person will die by gunfire and it will be Kimberlins fault.

Poor Brett He Misses His Snuggle-Bubba & Those Long Warm Showers On the Tier

Kimberlin is such a whining weenie. A weenie whiner wussie.

Brett Kimberlin Threatens Even More Unconstitutional Peace Orders Against Aaron Walker

Filed under: General— Patterico @ 7:34 am
Kimberlin, in a letter to Aaron Walker’s attorney yesterday:
Again, I want to be left alone by your client. That is my demand as required by Galloway and the criminal harassment statute. His false narrative that I framed him is defamatory and inciting extremists to threaten me. He is responsible for their conduct. I will not hesitate to seek additional peace orders or criminal harassment charges if he does not leave me alone.
The trouble is, Brett Kimberlin defines “leave me alone” as “don’t blog about the lawfare I have waged on you.” He wants the right to engage in dishonest and abusive litigation, but he demands more: the right to do it without criticism. As you can see from his response to Aaron’s filing for an emergency stay, Kimberlin continues to assert that he has the right to an email inbox free from Google Alerts relating to posts written by Aaron about Kimberlin:
Mr. Walker, contrary to what he says in his motion, did, as Judge Vaughey found, contact Petitioner directly in order to harass him. In his blog posts andon his Twitter page, he addressed Petitioner directly. He knew that his posts and tweets would end up in Petitioner’s email box, and taunted Petitioner to turn off “his Google alerts.” This is akin to telling someone to shut off their phone or stop their mail service if they did not want to receive harassing calls or mail.
Um, no, it’s not. If you set up a service where your phone rings every time someone talks about you in public, I am not “phoning” you if I talk about you in public. If you set up a service where you receive a piece of snail mail every time someone talks about you in public, I am not “mailing” you if I talk about you in public. Having a Google alert for your name is YOUR choice. It cannot be used as a sword to force people to stop talking about you — and it is not “taunting” for Aaron to say: if you don’t want your email inbox filled with notifications about Aaron’s posts, turn your Google alerts off

26 June 2012

Unexamined Premises » First Principles

Unexamined Premises » First Principles

With less than six months before the critical 2012 election, it’s vital that those on the right not fall into the trap of accepting the premises of leftist argumentation. To do that — to cede even a single inch of turf, or to acknowledge that they are arguing or advocating in good faith — is already to have lost. Therefore, repeat after me: 
Principles, not programs. Principles, not programs. Principles, not programs. 
We often hear it said that the coming election is as raw a clash of political philosophies as can be imagined — the most important election since 1860. And in a sense, that’s true. The national divide over the issue of slavery and its expansion into the rapidly settling territories was a constitutional crisis of the first order. It took the Civil War to sort out an issue that the Framers had partially punted, at a dreadful cost of lives and treasure. To say that the postwar Union was nothing like antebellum America is an understatement.